Compare and contrast federalism in Canada during the Keynesian era and Essay

Compare and contrast federalism in Canada during the Keynesian era and federalism in the neoliberal era - Essay Exampleions flexibility has been responsible for(p) for finding solutions to public policy along with assisting it to rise to the challenges faced (Canadian Federalism, 2007). To put it simply, the countrys federation has been a common strength in identifying divergences and overcoming them thereby constructing a stronger nation (Canadian Federalism, 2007).The two centers of focus of the Canadian federal experience signify cultural dualism, the desire and ability of French and position speaking Canadians to survive as such along with the use of institutions of the government which they respectively dominate, and the other is public action to satisfy the material aspirations of individuals and groups living at heart an economy in which burdens and benefits are ascertained by the economic policies of successive federal administrations (Smiley, 1965). Canadian federalism ex hibits the trend of decentralization (Lecture 17, n.d.). In spite of facing extensive challenges the Canadian federation has made it work towards this trend (Lecture 17, n.d.).Early judicial decisions showed an inclination towards provincial power in Canada after 1867 (Lecture 17, n.d.). The election victory of 1896 tag he reversal of Macdonalds centralism by Laurier (Lecture 17, n.d.). Both World War I and World War II brought interruptions in the movement (Lecture 17, n.d.). However, it spite of rough federal states opting to move more towards centralized over time, Canada has remained persistent in its trend of decentralization of authority (Lecture 17, n.d.).Due to the influence of Great Depression (1929-1939), the Rowell-Sirois tutelage revealed inclination towards economic management and social welfare from provinces to federal level (Lecture 17, n.d.). Reorganization of taxing functions was advised to favor federal assumption of new disbursement priorities and to enhance redistributive measures to offer national standards from coast to coast (Lecture 17, n.d.). However, the orders of the