Ms †Mahathir Foreign Policy Essay

Subsequence to the persistence, a shutdown has been interpreted in the 38th session of the linked Nations where the General-Secretary of linked Nations must specify a thorough study on south-polara issues which include the distribution of pictorial resource which open and the Antarctica accord System. Malaysia was able to depart a United Nations resolution to touch on issue of distribution of Antarctic natural resources in the upcoming United Nations schedule in November 1984.However, Malaysia failed to obtain a resolution for the establishment of the United Nations committee to alternate the Antarctica agreement remains as at that place were strong protests from the countries of Antarctica Treat System which were United State of America and Russia. Malaysia assumes that the continent of Antarctica as alpha in the terms of its find on Ecology and the surrounding universe of discourse and the humanss climate. For example, 90% of the worlds fresh water which d thorou ghly in the form of ice and one C were available in Antarctica.Besides, it also contains a potential supply of foodstuffs and raw materials such(prenominal) as iron minerals, coal, chromium, uranium, cobalt, nickel, copper, lead, zinc, gold, silver, platinum, oil and gas. Furthermore, in that respect argon also plants and animals that only lie down in Antarctica and in that location are some(prenominal) which are rare in new(prenominal)wise(a) places. Based on these facts, Malaysia demands the continent in Antarctica to become joint heritage for parking lot benefits for the whole world.In December 1959, issues which require the af sportings of Antarctica was managed by the representatives of the countries which are the members of the Antarctica Treaty System. Then, Malaysia has a view that the system only benefits the minor group of members of the Antarctica Treaty System. The system is not fair as the membership structure in the form of two levels (two-tier) because the decision flock only be made by 16 countries which are the occasion members of the treaty, though there are another 12 countries which are also the members of the treaty.These 12 countries are only whollyowed to conduct research without having the study power to vote or making decision. This is against to the intents of the former agreement in the Antarctica Treaty where Antarctica should be managed by international committee for the benefits of completely mankind. Moreover, 160 countries were in the United Nations shortly which most of them are composed of ontogeny countries. Therefore, their rights and their views should be concernn into consideration by the international committee of Antarctica.The privilege in the management system base on the Antarctica was not been satisfied. The former member countries held some(prenominal) closed-door meeting without the knowledge of the other members. These closed-door meeting was held in distinguish to establish a mineral gover nment activity for the purpose of mine mineral substances in their area. With the advent of Sea-Bed Convention on the lawfulness of the Sea and the suggestion of formation of internationalist Sea-Bed Authority, the mineral regime which proposed by members of the Antarctic Treaty is extremely against to most other countries.Mineral regime is another try by the former members of the agreement to advance their power in the opinion of Malaysia. Nevertheless, the activities of mining mineral substances can cause coarse destruction to the system bionomics in Antarctica. The objectives of this form _or_ system of government are to share the minerals in Antarctica for the benefits of all human beings. Next, it is to preserve the ecology and environment of the world. Besides, Antarctica is use to encourage the innovation of disarmament, de atomicisation and demilitarisationIt is hoped that the suggestions as well as Malaysias proposal to make Antarctica as the common heritage for the common benefit of the broad(a) world will be take into the consideration of the organizations of the United Nations. THE CONCEPT OF zone OF PEACE, FREEDOM AND NEUTRALITY (ZOPFAN) IN southeastward ASIA As the block that can be regarded as non-communist sou-east Asia, ASEAN in domain stick to neutrality. Malaysias proposal for the cornerstone of zone of peace, independence and neutrality or ZOPFAN was accepted as the ASEAN stance.The concept and this policy was announced in Kuala Lumpur by our fourth prime minister who was Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad on the twenty-seventh November 1971. There are some important factors and events that occurred in Southeast Asia which thrust ascend to the concept of the Zone of peace,Freedom and Neutrality. These factors and events are the spot of Southeast Asia is quite strategic to the capacious powers in the context of East-West political tensions political upheaval in Vietnam as well as the results of withdrawal of British troop from South east Asia and the United States from Vietnam in the aboriginal 70s.These developments had created anxiety among the ASEAN countries, as it may need regional stability. Next, the wars in Korea and Vietnam ASEAN convinced that interposition and support military superpowers conflict littler countries of Southeast Asia are often be the stability of this region. Furthermore, at the time there was a spirit of regionalisma which created ASEAN regional frugal cooperation that can be used as a catalyst to achieve ZOPFAN.The objective of Zone of peace, Freedom and Neutrality is to make Southeast Asia a region of peace, freedom and neutrality of political bickering major powers particularly the United States, Russia and Peoples Republic of China. Among the key strategies that have been explicate and implemented to achieve these objectives are by getting the great powers approval, recognition and undertake about the objective and efforts to realise the concept. Next, it is to draw out for eign military troops from Southeast Asia in the long run.Moreover, it makes Southeast Asia as a region free of nuclear weapon. In conclusion, the willingness of great powers to recognize and warranty Zone of Peace, Freedom and Neutrality is internal for the creation of ZOPFAN. In addition, support from all members of the ASEAN countries is also needed. However, ASEANs determination to hap to pursue the concept ZOPFAN is reflected by the ASEANs efforts to finda political solution in Cambodia based on the resolution of the United nations physical composition and the declaration of Internatonal Conference on Kampuchea 1981.